Clinical and Translational Science

Background. Compounded tirzepatide is prescribed at scale as a cheaper substitute for branded Mounjaro and Zepbound, yet the cost case is almost always built by setting one compounded price against one branded list price. That framing ignores the question that actually decides the answer: cheaper than which branded price the patient can reach. Branded tirzepatide is now sold at sharply different tiers, namely insurance copay (often $25-$150/month), LillyDirect Self Pay ($299-$449/month), and retail cash price ($1,000-$1,200/month). Whether compounded saves money turns entirely on which of these a given patient faces. A second open question is whether the two formulations even produce comparable effectiveness, since observed differences may reflect selection on insurance, baseline characteristics, and adherence rather than the drug. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of tirzepatide users in the Mochi Health telehealth program, classified by formulation from their refills as branded-only (Mounjaro/Zepbound; 6,238), compounded-only (71,683), or switchers (4,996); switchers were excluded from the formulation contrast. Among single-formulation patients with a documented six-month weight observation, the analytic cohort was 7,271 (869 branded, 6,402 compounded). The primary outcome was six-month percent body weight loss; the secondary outcome was >=10% response. We used 1:1 nearest-neighbor propensity-score matching (0.25 SD caliper) on baseline covariates only - age, sex, baseline BMI, baseline weight, comorbid diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, prior bariatric surgery, and self-reported insurance coverage - deliberately excluding post-treatment variables such as adherence and time in program, which are mediators of the formulation effect. We pre-specified an equivalence margin of +/-2 percentage points on mean loss and tested equivalence with two one-sided tests (TOST). A directed acyclic graph (DAG) makes the identifying assumptions explicit; metformin use could not be reliably ascertained and is treated as an unmeasured confounder. The cost comparison reports the savings or premium of compounded versus branded under five branded price scenarios: retail list, LillyDirect Self Pay (two dose tiers), and insurance copay (typical and low end). It is a cost comparison (cost-minimization under demonstrated similar effectiveness), not a formal cost-effectiveness analysis: we computed no ICER, QALY, or discounting. Results. Branded and compounded patients had similar outcomes even before adjustment (mean loss 11.7% vs 11.5%; >=10% response 60.9% vs 58.8%). The largest baseline difference between the groups was insurance coverage (branded patients far more likely insured; standardized mean difference 0.67), which matching balanced to 0.01. After 1:1 matching (718 pairs, all |SMD| < 0.04), mean loss was 11.4% vs 11.4% (difference +0.08 pp, 95% CI -0.70 to +0.80) and >=10% response 59.3% vs 57.2% (difference +2.1 pp, 95% CI -3.1 to +7.1). The two formulations were statistically equivalent within the pre-specified +/-2 pp margin (TOST p < 0.001). Cost depends on the branded scenario: compounded saves $6,000 over six months versus retail list price, $1,494 versus LillyDirect maintenance-dose (5-15 mg) Self Pay, and $594 over a low-dose (2.5 mg) LillyDirect prescription, while it costs $300 more than branded under a typical insurance copay ($150/month) and is more expensive still at lower copays (savings turn negative below $200/month). Conclusions. Branded and compounded tirzepatide were statistically equivalent in six-month effectiveness within a pre-specified +/-2 pp margin, so the choice between them is essentially a cost decision - and that cost advantage is real but conditional on the branded price the patient can access. It is large against retail list price and shrinks to zero or reverses against LillyDirect Self Pay or a low insurance copay. Whether compounded is the lower-cost choice for an individual patient is, therefore, a question about which price tier that patient faces.

Background. GLP-1 receptor agonist trials are tightly controlled: standardized titration, intensive dietary counseling, frequent in-person follow-up, and rigorous exclusion criteria. The real world is none of those things. In a U.S. telehealth GLP-1 program, diet engagement, exercise, medication choice, dose timing, and out-of-pocket cost vary substantially from patient to patient. Whether trial-level efficacy translates into the outcomes a patient and clinician will actually see is an open question, and the answer matters, because telehealth is now where most GLP-1 prescribing happens. Methods. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 13,507 adults who used a single GLP-1 agent (tirzepatide or semaglutide) through the Mochi Health telehealth obesity program and had a documented six-month weight observation. The primary outcome was achievement of >=10% total body weight loss at six months. To address selection bias in the tirzepatide-semaglutide comparison, we used 1:1 nearest-neighbor propensity-score matching on age, sex, baseline BMI, baseline weight, and comorbid diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and prior bariatric surgery (recorded at intake), with a 0.25 SD caliper on the propensity logit. We drew a directed acyclic graph (DAG) with a clinical co-author to make the identifying assumptions explicit and to mark where unobserved variables (insurance, socioeconomic status, concomitant medications such as metformin) limit causal interpretation. We report multivariable predictors via logistic regression, compute an E-value for the matched contrast, and benchmark our point estimates against landmark RCT outcomes. Results. Overall, 59.1% of patients achieved >=10% loss at six months, with mean loss of 11.5% (median 11.3%). Threshold attainment was 86.6% at >=5%, 59.1% at >=10%, 27.5% at >=15%, and 9.1% at >=20%. The unadjusted tirzepatide-semaglutide response gap was +16.0 percentage points (68.8% vs 52.8%); after 1:1 propensity-score matching (3,480 pairs, all post-match |SMD| < 0.05) the gap was +18.1 percentage points (69.6% vs 51.6%, 95% CI +15.9 to +20.3). Matching on the measured covariates did not attenuate the advantage, indicating that selection on those characteristics does not explain it; the matched risk ratio was 1.35 (E-value 2.04). The gap was unchanged when a self-reported insurance indicator was added to the matching (+18.4 pp) and remained large (+14.2 pp) within patients who reached a therapeutic dose. Multivariable predictors of response were tirzepatide (OR 2.10, 1.95-2.26), female sex (OR 1.37, 1.20-1.56), and prior bariatric surgery (OR 1.36, 1.18-1.57); response was lower with comorbid diabetes (OR 0.84, 0.77-0.92) and, modestly, with higher baseline BMI per unit (OR 0.98, 0.97-0.99). Response varied by baseline BMI, from 58.0% in overweight patients (BMI <30) and a peak of 63.5% in Obese I to 52.4% in Obese III. Conclusions. Real-world response to GLP-1 therapy in a telehealth setting is meaningfully attenuated from RCT benchmarks but remains clinically substantial: roughly three in five patients reach the 10% threshold. The tirzepatide advantage over semaglutide is large and, notably, does not shrink under propensity-score matching on measured confounders, so it is not an artifact of the observed selection variables; an unmeasured confounder would need a risk-ratio association of about 2.0 with both drug choice and response to explain it away (E-value 2.04). The findings are observational, conditional on the DAG's identifying assumptions, and unmeasured confounders (insurance, socioeconomic status, concomitant medications) remain possible.

Background: Sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators can cause transient, dose-related negative chronotropic effects. Mocravimod is an oral S1PR modulator that is developed as a maintenance therapy in allogenic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). This phase I study evaluated whether two dose-titration regimens attenuate early bradycardia when initiating mocravimod while preserving pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) activity. Patients and methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, healthy adults received once-daily oral mocravimod using either dose titration (DT) regimen DT1 (0.3-2.0 mg with 4-day stepwise escalation) or regimen DT2 (0.5 mg to Day 14, 1.2 mg Days 15-18, then 2 mg), a fixed 2 mg regimen, or placebo for 21 days. The primary endpoint was the number of bradycardia episodes on treatment initiation and dose-escalation days derived from 24-hour Holter monitoring; PK of mocravimod and mocravimod-phosphate (whole blood) and PD effects (absolute lymphocyte count [ALC]) were assessed. Results: Fifty-six participants were randomized and 53 completed the study. Both titration regimens resulted in fewer bradycardia episodes than fixed initiation at 2 mg during the first week of treatment. Differences between titration and fixed dosing were no longer evident after Day 9, consistent with tolerance development. PK profiles were consistent with prior phase I data. By Day 21, DT1 achieved exposures close to the fixed 2 mg regimen, whereas DT2 yielded lower exposures, reflecting slower escalation. Peripheral lymphopenia developed in all active treatment groups and was comparable between regimens by Day 21, returning toward baseline by study end. Safety was similar between titration regimens and placebo, with similar distribution and incidence of adverse events. No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusion: Two practical titration regimens mitigated the early negative chronotropic effect observed with fixed-dose initiation of mocravimod at 2 mg once daily. Importantly, titration preserved the expected PK and PD profile, supporting dose escalation as an effective initiation strategy to improve early cardiac tolerability.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate real-world adverse event (AE) signals of EV to provide evidence-based guidance for its safe clinical application. Methods: Data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from the period of 2019 Q1-2025 Q3 were analyzed. Disproportionality analysis algorithms, including the reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM), were utilized to mine safety signals.The time to onset (TTO) was evaluated using the Weibull distribution model. Results: Among 11,697,906 reports, 4,177 EV-treated patients experienced 14,511 AEs. The most common System Organ Classes (SOCs) were skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (18.23%), general disorders and administration site conditions (13.17%).Multi-algorithm consensus identified 179 positive signals. Alongside known toxicities (rash, peripheral neuropathy, hyperglycemia), potential new signals emerged, including dysgeusia, atypical skin lesions, and myelosuppression. Median TTO was 14 days, with the Weibull {beta} of 0.736, confirming an "early failure" profile. Subgroup analysis revealed toxicity heterogeneity: patients aged [&ge;]65 and females exhibited stronger signals for fatal severe cutaneous adverse reactions, while patients aged < 65 and males showed higher susceptibility to neurological and metabolic toxicities. Conclusions: The real-world safety profile of EV confirms known toxicities, reveals new risks (e.g., dysgeusia), and shows toxicity concentrated in the first treatment cycle. Clinical practice requires proactive monitoring during the first two weeks using demographic-specific strategies: vigilance for fatal skin toxicity in elderly and female patients, and close follow-up of neurological and metabolic indicators in younger and male populations.

A global pandemic requires accelerated strategies to mitigate public healthcare risks and preserve societal stability, either by repurposing existing drugs or by rapidly developing novel drug candidates. Computational platforms have accelerated candidate identification for both routes. A critical gap is the translation from in vitro potency to predicted clinical efficacy, which determines whether a prioritized candidate can achieve therapeutic effect under realistic dosing. To address this, we developed the Pandemic Pharmacology Platform for COMPUTational Evaluation of anti-infectives (PPP-COMPUTE), a comprehensive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) simulation platform designed to support evaluation and prioritization of drug candidates and clinical trial design during a pandemic. PPP-COMPUTE integrates experimentally derived anti-infective potency data (e.g., EC50) with PK/PD modeling to evaluate whether clinical dosing regimens can achieve sufficient exposure for therapeutic efficacy in patients. The platform incorporates mechanism-based dynamic models with a focus on viral pathogens to simulate time-dependent viral load trajectories under various treatment scenarios, enabling quantitative assessment of antiviral response and optimization of dosing strategies. Probability of target attainment analyses further support evaluation of regimen feasibility against predefined pharmacological targets. The clinical trial module generates simulated virological endpoints to evaluate candidate clinical study designs. PPP-COMPUTE is an accessible and quantitative framework that links PK and preclinical anti-infective potency data with predicted clinical benefit, thereby supporting rapid drug evaluation during future pandemics.

Bayesian borrowing of external information can improve trial efficiency, particularly in pediatric and rare disease settings where patient populations are limited, but may introduce bias and inflate the Type~I error rate when the trial differs from external studies. Recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) draft Bayesian guidance emphasizes careful evaluation of external information, prior specification, and assessment of operating characteristics. This paper compares three meta-analytic-predictive (MAP)-based methods for Bayesian borrowing: the MAP prior, robust MAP (RMAP) prior, and self-adapting mixture (SAM) prior. An adaptive platform trial design in Rett syndrome is used as a case study. Simulation studies evaluate frequentist operating characteristics under varying prior--data conflict, between-study heterogeneity, treatment effects, and clinically significant differences (CSDs) for the SAM prior. The MAP prior achieved the greatest efficiency when external and current data were compatible but exhibited the largest bias under substantial prior--data conflict. The RMAP priors improved robustness through fixed robust-component weights, whereas the SAM prior adaptively adjusted borrowing and was less sensitive to prior--data conflict while retaining efficiency gains when the data were compatible. Although the CSD influenced the degree of adaptive borrowing, as reflected by effective sample size, it had only a modest impact on frequentist operating characteristics. Sensitivity analyses using a skeptical robust component yielded similar qualitative conclusions, while accentuating the differences between the MAP and RMAP priors. These findings provide guidance for evaluating and selecting MAP-based borrowing strategies before trial implementation, particularly in rare disease settings, consistent with current FDA recommendations.

Retinal and choroidal vascular diseases are major causes of vision loss that require frequent intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy. Anti-angiogenic peptide AXT107 demonstrated efficacy in preclinical studies and was advanced to the clinical stage. To provide for sustained delivery of the peptide and avoid complications with intravitreal injection, we evaluated suprachoroidal delivery of AXT107 microparticles (MP-AXT107). The original, soluble AXT107 formulation was ineffective at inhibiting laser-induced choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in our rat model and was consequently reformulated as microparticles. MP-AXT107 demonstrated high peptide incorporation efficiency, reproducible morphology, and physical and chemical stability for at least 9 months under refrigerated storage. In the rat CNV model, suprachoroidal MP-AXT107 significantly reduced neovascular area by approximately 60% relative to vehicle controls. Safety and durability were evaluated in a 9-month GLP toxicology study in Gottingen minipigs following a single suprachoroidal injection of vehicle or MP-AXT107 (0.125-1.25 mg/eye). Transient increases in IOP and mild ocular inflammatory findings were observed immediately following administration but resolved rapidly without lasting effects. No treatment-related adverse ocular findings were observed during the remainder of the study, and the highest tested dose (1.25 mg/eye) was established as the no-observed-adverse-effect level. Bioanalysis at study completion demonstrated persistent AXT107 localization primarily within choroid/RPE and scleral tissues, with no signs of systemic exposure. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that suprachoroidal delivery of MP-AXT107 enables sustained anti-angiogenic activity with favorable ocular safety and prolonged tissue retention, supporting further clinical development as a durable therapy for retinal and choroidal vascular diseases.

mRNA-based therapeutics have emerged as a transformative class of medicines, yet their translation beyond infectious disease vaccines remains challenged by the absence of an integrated pharmacological framework accounting for the tri-component nature of these therapies - the lipid nanoparticle, the mRNA, and the expressed protein. Here, we present a modular, multiscale computational platform integrating two complementary mechanistic models covering the full pharmacological cascade of mRNA-based immunotherapies. The first is a Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP) model describing the immunological response to mRNA vaccines, from antigen expression in antigen-presenting cells through B cell activation and circulating antibody production. The second is a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model tracking whole-body disposition of mRNA-encoded therapeutic antibodies, incorporating a molecular layer resolving LNP uptake, endosomal mRNA escape, and intracellular translation. Both models are informed by a machine learning pipeline that maps IVT-mRNA nucleotide sequences directly onto kinetic parameters, enabling product-specific model simulations. We propose this platform as a step toward the quantitative pharmacological framework that mRNA therapeutics currently lack, and as a practical tool for model-informed design and development of this therapeutic class.

Purpose: To evaluate whether initiation of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) is associated with anti-VEGF treatment burden in type 2 diabetes patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) in the IRIS(R) Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight). Methods: Incident GLP-1RA initiators were matched 1:1 with controls via Mahalanobis distance matching (9,896 pairs; N=19,792) on sociodemographics, DME risk factors, and factors influencing GLP-1RA prescription including hypertension, obesity, chronic kidney disease. A longitudinal mixed-effects event-study model evaluated monthly anti-VEGF injection frequency over a 36-month window (12 months before through 24 months after initiation), adjusting for DME duration. Visual acuity (VA) and central subfield thickness (CST) were secondary outcomes. Results: Following GLP-1RA initiation, anti-VEGF injection trajectories did not significantly differ between the matched GLP-1RA and control cohorts (interaction coefficients -0.18 to 1.59, P>0.05). Likewise, no differences in VA were observed between cohorts (-0.05 to 0.04 logMAR, P>0.05) or CST (-14.12 to 33.58 {micro}m, P>0.05). Conclusion: In these matched cohorts, GLP-1RA initiation was not associated with the trajectory of anti-VEGF use or changes in VA or CST. Precis We used the American Academy of Ophthalmology IRIS(R) Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight) to identify patients with DME. In 19,792 matched patients, there was no significant reduction in injection frequency post GLP1-RA initiation and no significant change in VA or CST.

Introduction: Conventional substance-level disproportionality analysis may miss safety patterns specific to a dose form, route, or intended site. More granular analyses are hindered by incomplete, inconsistent reporting of product information. The Pharmaceutical Product Identifier (PhPID), representing products by substance, strength, and dose form, may support more granular analyses. Objective: To explore the use of PhPID-like dose form information for site-specific disproportionality analysis in dexamethasone. Methods: We evaluated VigiBase reports (January 1, 2001 - December 31, 2024) for completeness of dose form and route data. We standardized dexamethasone entries to PhPID Level 3 standards, representing substance and administrable dose form. Through disproportionality analysis (Information Component, IC) we compared substance-level and site-specific results. Results: Among 56.4 million suspected/interacting drugs, dose form was reported in 47.7%, route in 69.4%. Among 109,248 dexamethasone entries, 703 dose form and 80 route variations were mapped to 53 and 44 standard codes respectively; about half could be mapped unambiguously. Site-specific analyses revealed biologically plausible patterns not apparent in substance-level analyses. Ocular use showed higher ICs for glaucoma and cataract, while systemic use showed higher IC for psychiatric and endocrine events (e.g., depression, agitation, Cushing's syndrome). IC time-trends suggested that some signals (e.g., cataract with Ocular use) could emerge earlier in site-specific analyses. Conclusion: More granular product information, aligned with PhPID, may improve signal detection and characterization of site-specific safety issues. These findings support granular identifiers in pharmacovigilance while highlighting the need for better capture and standardization of dose form and route of administration data.

Background Treatment of Raynaud phenomenon(RP) with oral vasodilators(calcium channel block-ers and phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors) has shown moderate efficacy, may not benefit to all patients, and adverse effects often compromise long-term treatment. In addition, a large placebo effect may jeopardize the assessment of treatment benefits. Pharmaconutritional strategies aiming at increasing nitric oxide bioavailability (beet-root juice and L-citrulline) may be promising alternatives, and we further hypothesized that patient preference for a treatment could be a driver of the response. Methods This study consisted of a series of randomized, double-blind, N-of-1 trials conducted in outpa-tients with primary or secondary RP. Each patient underwent a multiple crossover design with repeated blocks of randomized treatments periods: 2 weeks of placebo, 2 weeks of active treat-ments, and 1 week of washout. Outcomes included the Raynaud Condition Score(RCS), fre-quency and daily duration of attacks. Each patient prespecified its preferred primary outcome, efficacy threshold and preferred treatment, which was used for stratified randomization. Gener-alized linear mixed-effects models were used to determine individual and aggregated efficacy. Results Twenty-one patients completed 2 to 8 treatment blocks. Seventeen patients tested L-citrulline, 17 beetroot juice and 13 both treatments. Ten patients selected RCS as a primary outcome, 6 patients the number of attacks and 5 the duration of attacks. Me-dian threshold for considering treatment efficacy chosen by patients was 50% (min-max 20% to 75%) reduction of symptoms. Using individual criteria to define efficacy neither L-citrulline nor beetroot juice showed significant efficacy compared to baseline. Based on the aggregated data, our results show no significant difference between L-citrulline and the L-citrulline-based placebo, nor between beetroot juice and nitrate-depleted beetroot juice, with the exception of the daily duration of RP attacks with beetroot juice (p=0.002). Finally, there was a marked placebo response, notably when patients received their preferred treatment. Conclusions: Our study did not show significant beetroot juice or L-citrulline efficacy in RP. However, we found that individual preference for one treatment over another maximizes responses to both placebo and active treatments, particularly with regard to the frequency and duration of RP attacks, thus suggesting that a real and modifiable placebo effect exists in RP.

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitors are widely used for the treatment of renal anemia; however, their effects on intraocular vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression remain unclear. In this study, we examined the effects of all five HIF-PH inhibitors --roxadustat, daprodustat, vadadustat, enarodustat, and molidustat--on Vegfa expression in the retina in mice. C57BL/6J mice were orally administered each inhibitor. Six hours after administration, the kidney, retina, and liver were collected, and transcription levels were quantified by real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR. Renal Epo transcription was significantly increased by molidustat (P < 0.01), roxadustat (P < 0.01), and enarodustat (P < 0.05). Retinal Vegfa transcription was significantly increased by four inhibitors (P < 0.01), with molidustat showing no significant effect. In the liver, Vegfa transcription was increased by daprodustat (P < 0.05) and vadadustat (P < 0.01). Furthermore, renal Epo and retinal Vegfa transcription levels showed a moderate positive correlation with a marginal trend toward statistical significance (r = 0.37, P = 0.08). These findings indicate that HIF-PH inhibitors differentially regulate hypoxia-responsive genes across tissues and suggest that retinal VEGF upregulation should be considered when evaluating the safety of these agents.

Existing interfaces modulate user experience through visual, auditory, and haptic channels, but direct physiological modulation, which programmatically alters a user's internal state, remains largely underexplored. We present a wearable sonophoresis patch that uses low-frequency acoustic stimulation to deliver psychoactive substances transdermally, and evaluate its potential for programmable physiological modulation in HCI. We tested this in a double-blinded study (N=26) delivering 100 mg caffeine versus sham control, recording physiological signals during rest and a sustained attention task (SART). The planned comparison for heart rate standard deviation during rest was significant (HR-SD p=0.025, d=1.48), with the caffeine group showing suppressed HR~SD consistent with sympathetic activation. Mean heart rate at rest was not significant (p=0.365), but exploratory analyses during the cognitive task revealed significant cardiovascular divergence: heart rate (p=0.003) and heart rate standard deviation (p=0.027) both moved in directions consistent with systemic caffeine delivery, with effects emerging within minutes of device activation and a sustained group effect across all task rounds (p<0.001). These results provide indirect evidence that wearable sonophoresis can deliver substances to modulate user physiology, opening the design space for on-skin chemical interfaces that adapt delivery in real time to change the user's physiological state on demand.

Background/Objective: Diabetic macular oedema (DMO) is a leading cause for visual impairment primarily managed with intravitreal anti-VEGF agents such as ranibizumab (RBZ). Levosulpiride (LSP), a prokinetic medication, was recently repositioned as a safe oral treatment for naive DMO. Here, we investigated the adjuvant effect of oral LSP in combination with intravitreal RBZ injections for treating persistent DMO. Subjects/Methods: Double-blinded, dual-centre, phase 2 trial in patients with centre-involving DMO randomly assigned to be orally treated with placebo (15 patients, 18 eyes) or LSP (18 patients, 19 eyes) along with 3 successive (4 weeks apart) RBZ intravitreal injections and a 24-week follow-up. Results: Baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved (p[&le;]0.04) at week 12 in both RBZ+placebo and RBZ+LSP, but improvement was maintained (p=0.009) at week 24 only in RBZ+LSP. In agreement, longitudinal changes from baseline in BCVA from weeks 12 to 24 defined superior (p=0.02) visual gains measured by the Area Under the Curve (AUC) in RBZ+LSP vs. RBZ+placebo. The baseline value of mean central foveal thickness (CFT) decreased (p[&le;]0.002) in both groups at week 12 and CFT reduction was significant (p=0.006) at week 24 only in RBZ+LSP. Also, longitudinal changes from baseline in CFT resulted in a higher AUC reduction (p[&le;]0.04) at weeks 4 to12 in RBZ+LSP vs. RBZ+placebo. No significant adverse side effects were detected. Conclusions: Adjunctive LSP showed functional and anatomical benefits over the first-line therapy with RBZ. Adjuvant properties may involve the LSP-induced intraocular upregulation and downregulation of vasoinhibin and VEGF, respectively. Larger clinical trials are warranted.

Introduction No widely adopted guidelines exist for collecting and reporting donor-level metadata in tissue-based research, limiting interpretability, reproducibility, and potentially introducing bias. This study aimed to inform ethical and appropriate metadata practices. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 investigators from the Human BioMolecular Atlas Program. Thematic analysis using inductively derived codes identified metadata elements and perspectives on their collection and reporting. Results Participants identified 80 metadata variables across six domains: demographic, sociodemographic, medical history, personally identifying information, cause of death, and tissue/organ data. Most supported routine collection and reporting of demographics and medical history, whereas views on cause of death and sociodemographic data were mixed. Conclusion We recommend routinely collecting and reporting demographics and medical history, while restricting cause of death and sociodemographic variables to situations with explicit consent or justification. These findings provide initial evidence to inform ethical donor metadata guidelines, with further stakeholder engagement and consensus-building needed.

Background. Long COVID affects an estimated 400 million people worldwide, and is associated with low quality of life. Nearly all completed Long COVID clinical trials reported no benefit, and most required participants to travel to study sites. This requirement systematically excludes severely affected patients. Because there are numerous candidate therapeutics with established safety profiles and regulatory approvals for other indications, scaled, efficient evaluation of therapeutics is needed. Methods. We designed and are conducting a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase two trial of tirzepatide for Long COVID fatigue, using an entirely remote infrastructure. Design elements included electronic consent, identity and diagnosis verification through document upload, cold-chain delivery of an injectable study drug through a central pharmacy, shared decision-making for dose titration, repeated at-home capillary blood collection in a biospecimen subcohort, weekly participant touch points through study application, wrist-worn wearable monitoring, and clinical support. The trial is operating under FDA Investigational New Drug authorization. Results. This trial enrolled 1,058 participants in 73 days, at least double the rate of any other Long COVID trial. Mean baseline metrics include mean Fatigue Severity Scale of 59.3 (standard deviation [SD] 4.9), daily step count of 3,611 (SD 2,706, general population reference mean 7,731), EQ-5D-5L of 0.6 (SD 0.2), and FUNCAP27 4.0 (SD 1.0), which was a more severely affected population than other clinical trials that collected comparable data. Study processes are working as designed. Participants use existing advocacy and support channels to gather and communicate. Conclusions. A direct-to-participant, siteless infrastructure can support a double-blind placebo-controlled trial of an injectable drug at scale, accelerate accrual, and reach severely affected participants who are routinely excluded by site-based designs. Modernizing drug distribution and regulatory pathways is needed to realize the full potential of decentralized infrastructure for drug repurposing clinical trials.

Background and Aims: Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE) are used to assess liver stiffness in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD); patients may be assessed by different methods over time. Because 2D-SWE fibrosis cut-offs are not uniformly validated and no biopsy or magnetic resonance elastography reference is available, we asked whether switching methods moves patients across decision thresholds. We evaluated agreement and decision-threshold interchangeability between VCTE and 2D-SWE in MASLD with obesity. Methods: In a retrospective cross-sectional agreement study at a tertiary-care center, 317 consecutive adults with MASLD underwent same-day VCTE (FibroScan) and GE LOGIQ E9/E10 2D-SWE. Continuous agreement was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis; the categorical analysis compared binary clinical decision thresholds (VCTE [&ge;]8.0/[&ge;]10.0 kPa; 2D-SWE [&ge;]7.204/[&ge;]8.060 kPa) using Cohen {kappa} and McNemar tests. Prespecified sensitivity analyses and a post-hoc recalibration were performed; VCTE served as operational reference. Results: VCTE yielded higher values (geometric mean VCTE/2D-SWE ratio, 1.23; ratio limits of agreement, 0.64 2.40; intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.41). At the lower threshold, 71 of 117 VCTE-positive patients (61%) were below the 2D-SWE threshold versus 5 of 200 (2.5%) reclassified upward (agreement 76.0%; {kappa} 0.417; P<.001); the upper threshold was similar (38 of 63, 60%, vs 8 of 254, 3.1%). Discordance persisted across cut-offs; agreement worsened descriptively across BMI strata. Recalibration removed the directional asymmetry but not the discordance (agreement unchanged, 76.0%). Conclusions: In MASLD patients, switching from VCTE to 2D-SWE reclassified decision-threshold status in ~60% of VCTE-positive patients; recalibration removed the directional bias but not the disagreement. Follow-up should use the same elastography modality and, when possible, the same platform.

BackgroundMetabolic dysfunction is characterized by dysregulated lipid metabolism, lipotoxicity, insulin resistance, and chronic low-grade inflammation, contributing to obesity and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Multi-target therapeutic strategies that restore lipid homeostasis are of growing interest. Patolakaturohiniyadi Kashayam (PKR), a classical Ayurvedic polyherbal formulation, was investigated for its potential to modulate lipid metabolism and ameliorate metabolic dysfunction. MethodsAn integrated approach combining network pharmacology, in vitro, lipidomics, and in vivo studies was employed. Hub gene identification and KEGG pathway enrichment were performed to elucidate molecular targets. Anti-steatotic and anti-adipogenic effects were assessed in hepatocytes and adipocytes, followed by lipidomic profiling. Efficacy was further evaluated in a high-fat high-fructose diet (HFHFD)-induced animal model. ResultsNetwork pharmacology identified key targets including TP53, AKT1, IL6, TNF, and STAT3, enriched in pathways related to lipid metabolism, inflammation, and metabolic regulation. PKR significantly reduced lipid droplet accumulation and intracellular triglyceride levels in vitro. Lipidomics revealed suppression of diacylglycerol-mediated lipotoxicity and restoration of phospholipid balance, characterized by increased lysophospholipids and phosphatidylethanolamines with normalization of phosphatidylcholine species. In vivo, PKR reduced body, liver, and adipose tissue weights, improved serum lipid profiles, and decreased AST and ALT levels. Histological analyses demonstrated reduced lipid accumulation and inflammation, along with preservation of adipose tissue architecture. PKR also improved glucose tolerance and significantly elevated plasma GLP-1 levels. ConclusionPKR exerts potent anti-steatotic and anti-obesogenic effects through coordinated regulation of lipid metabolism, inflammation, and incretin signalling, highlighting its potential as a multi-target therapeutics for metabolic dysfunction.

Abstract Background: Every non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring (NI-CGM) technology introduced into the landscape faces the same skeptical question, from regulators, clinicians, and competing developers alike: is the candidate signal actually specific to glucose, or does an apparently reasonable accuracy figure simply reflect a model fitting to motion, temperature, calibration offset, or trial-duration artifact? Existing evaluation practice does not answer this question directly. NI-CGM performance is instead reported almost exclusively with metrics inherited from minimally invasive, subcutaneous CGM, the Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD), Clarke/Parkes error grids, and ISO 15197-style agreement rates, which were designed for sensors whose glucose specificity is already chemically established and which therefore take specificity as a premise rather than treating it as a result to be demonstrated. Methods: We present a methodology for demonstrating NI-CGM technology glucose specificity during the algorithm-development phase, and illustrate it with a case study based on a quantum-cascade-laser (QCL) photoacoustic NI-CGM device (Neogly) evaluated in the SKAMo-2 free-living clinical trial (eight participants with type 1 diabetes). The methodology combines a white-noise control, a constant-glycemia control, a sensor-ablation control that removes the candidate physical signal while retaining auxiliary covariates, and explicit reporting of the train/test generalization level, so that a reported MARD can be read as evidence of specificity rather than taken on faith. Results: Removing the mid-infrared photoacoustic (PA) signal from the model while retaining all auxiliary sensors (accelerometer, skin temperature, hygrometry, PPG) degraded performance at every generalization level tested, inter-patient MARD rose from 35.0% with the PA signal to 43.1% without it, and intra-experimentation MARD rose from 22.5% to 23.9%, providing direct, internal evidence that the PA channel itself, and not merely the auxiliary covariates, carries glucose-specific information. At the same time, an algorithm trained on pure Gaussian noise produced a MARD of 25% over short test windows, and a trivial constant-glycemia predictor outperformed every machine-learning model tested when generalization was extended from a single recording to an unseen patient (MARD 55% for the naive constant model versus 37% for a deep neural network on inter-patient splits). Reported in isolation, any of these MARD values is uninterpretable; reported against one another, they jointly demonstrate that the signal is specific to glucose while also bounding how much of the headline accuracy figure that specificity currently explains. Conclusions: We propose a specificity-demonstration methodology for NI-CGM technology development, comprising (1) signal quality gating prior to any algorithm benchmarking, (2) a white-noise control to test for genuine information content, (3) a constant-glycemia control to expose trial-duration bias, (4) a sensor-ablation control that isolates the contribution of the candidate physical signal from auxiliary covariates, (5) explicit reporting of the data-splitting generalization level (intra-experimentation, intra-patient, inter-patient). This methodology answers a question that precedes clinical accuracy reporting and that recognized clinical frameworks such as the IFCC Working Group on CGM's Dynamic Glucose Regions guideline are not designed to answer: not how accurate is the device, but is the device measuring glucose at all. We argue that without these controls, MARD and error-grid values for NI-CGM are not comparable across studies and may either overstate clinical readiness or undermine promising technologies. We recommend that this specificity methodology be applied routinely once a candidate NI-CGM sensor reaches algorithm-development stage, alongside and as a deliberate complement to IFCC-style clinical accuracy reporting once the device is mature enough for that evaluation. Keywords: non-invasive continuous glucose monitoring; glucose specificity; algorithm validation; MARD; benchmarking; machine learning; photoacoustic spectroscopy; sensor ablation; Clarke error grid

Effective postoperative pain control is essential following laparoscopic cholecystectomy, yet the analgesic value of a standardised 150 mg preoperative dose of pregabalin has not been clearly established. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesised evidence from seven randomised controlled trials published between 2008 and 2025 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pregabalin when administered before surgery. Four trials reported 24-hour postoperative pain scores, and pooled analysis demonstrated that pregabalin significantly reduced pain compared with control (SMD = 0.80 lower; 95% CI, 1.42 to 0.18 lower; p = 0.01), although statistical heterogeneity was high (I-squared = 81%). Pregabalin also produced notable reductions in opioid consumption, including fentanyl (SMD = 1.24 lower; p = 0.002) and tramadol (SMD = 4.21 lower; p = 0.002), again with considerable variability across studies. Sedation was slightly increased but did not reach statistical significance, and there were no significant differences in postoperative nausea, vomiting, or headache. Sensitivity analyses supported the stability of these findings. Overall, the results indicate that a single 150 mg preoperative dose of pregabalin meaningfully reduces postoperative pain and opioid requirements following laparoscopic cholecystectomy while maintaining an acceptable safety profile, supporting its use as part of a multimodal analgesic strategy.